<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook 2007 &#8211; When is 200 pixels not 200 pixels? Spacer gifs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/</link>
	<description>Technology, Web, Toys, Games, Design, Entertainment, Gadgets, &#38; Geeking Out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-21775</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-21775</guid>
		<description>anyone tried to reverse engineer word&#039;s image rendering?  how does this possibly happen?  thanks for the save!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone tried to reverse engineer word&#8217;s image rendering?  how does this possibly happen?  thanks for the save!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-19418</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-19418</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this post, it helped me figure why in the world outlook 07 wasn&#039;t displaying my spacers correctly (such a pain!) again thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this post, it helped me figure why in the world outlook 07 wasn&#8217;t displaying my spacers correctly (such a pain!) again thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-18519</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-18519</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much! I spent 2 hours rebuilding my template over and over not understanding what was wrong, 10px by 10px did the trick! This seems to effect aol users as well. Not sure who&#039;s still using aol but anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much! I spent 2 hours rebuilding my template over and over not understanding what was wrong, 10px by 10px did the trick! This seems to effect aol users as well. Not sure who&#8217;s still using aol but anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr C</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-14338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-14338</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this awesome tip!

I always used to think that they reverted to Word because of the security hole ridden IE6, but the answer is much simpler:

The reason why Microsoft reverted to the Word HTML rendering engine is because without it, Outlook would not be able to display fancy Word-style formatting like SmartArt, Charts and WordArt.

But what is the point of using those functions unless the recipient also uses Outlook 2007?

The monopoly strikes again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this awesome tip!</p>
<p>I always used to think that they reverted to Word because of the security hole ridden IE6, but the answer is much simpler:</p>
<p>The reason why Microsoft reverted to the Word HTML rendering engine is because without it, Outlook would not be able to display fancy Word-style formatting like SmartArt, Charts and WordArt.</p>
<p>But what is the point of using those functions unless the recipient also uses Outlook 2007?</p>
<p>The monopoly strikes again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-13630</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-13630</guid>
		<description>Wow, Thanks.  This is a BIG life saver for my customers and me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Thanks.  This is a BIG life saver for my customers and me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James A</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-13584</link>
		<dc:creator>James A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-13584</guid>
		<description>How the hello can microsoft shaft us like this? - MS word to render emails? - Don&#039;t make me laugh.

Do you think that MS will ever admit defeat and go back to more sensible rendering as seen in firefox or even IE7?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the hello can microsoft shaft us like this? &#8211; MS word to render emails? &#8211; Don&#8217;t make me laugh.</p>
<p>Do you think that MS will ever admit defeat and go back to more sensible rendering as seen in firefox or even IE7?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-11450</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-11450</guid>
		<description>A colleague of mine was having no end of trouble with this problem - and I couldn&#039;t find anything wrong with her code (because there WAS nothing wrong with it). Solved. Thanks Ian!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of mine was having no end of trouble with this problem &#8211; and I couldn&#8217;t find anything wrong with her code (because there WAS nothing wrong with it). Solved. Thanks Ian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-9552</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-9552</guid>
		<description>Thank you, thank you - this was driving me to despair. No other resources out there seem to have picked this up, and it is at the heart of using &#039;spacer gif&#039; layouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you &#8211; this was driving me to despair. No other resources out there seem to have picked this up, and it is at the heart of using &#8217;spacer gif&#8217; layouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Escudero</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-9102</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Escudero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-9102</guid>
		<description>Thanks!! this is so great, for those trying to use photoshop slices, should solve many issues. 

I sent a mail some hours ago and some clients complained about bad look on outlook 2007, now i just changed the 1px x 1px spacer for the 10x10 images and bu a la!! its solved! on line!! 

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!! this is so great, for those trying to use photoshop slices, should solve many issues. </p>
<p>I sent a mail some hours ago and some clients complained about bad look on outlook 2007, now i just changed the 1px x 1px spacer for the 10&#215;10 images and bu a la!! its solved! on line!! </p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivar Larsson</title>
		<link>http://www.ianhoar.com/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-2453</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivar Larsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imhmedia.net/2007/10/20/outlook-2007-when-is-200-pixels-not-200-pixels/#comment-2453</guid>
		<description>Incredible.... Thanks for this find!

I hate word and it&#039;s silly excuse for a css/html renderer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible&#8230;. Thanks for this find!</p>
<p>I hate word and it&#8217;s silly excuse for a css/html renderer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
